Search intent and user behaviour
Every search has a goal behind it. A page that does not match that goal rarely ranks, however well it is optimised.
- Time
- 16 min
- Level
- beginner
- Reviewed
- 5 November 2026
After this lesson you can
- Classify a query by intent with two common models.
- Read the results page to see which intent Google has inferred.
- Explain why one page should usually serve one main intent.
Google lists understanding the meaning of the query as the first step in ranking results. Before it judges any page, it works out what the searcher is actually trying to do. That goal is called search intent.
Two ways to classify intent
The practitioner model
Most SEO tools and courses use four categories. The first three come from a 2002 research paper by Andrei Broder. The fourth was added later by the industry.
| Intent | The searcher wants to | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Informational | Learn something | how does a heat pump work |
| Navigational | Reach a specific site | kleo.lt |
| Commercial investigation | Compare options before buying | best robot vacuum 2026 |
| Transactional | Do something now, usually buy | buy dyson v15 |
Google's rater guidelines
Google's Search Quality Rater Guidelines, which teach human raters how to judge results, describe intent differently:
- Know: find information or explore a topic. Know Simple is a special case with a short, correct answer, such as a height or a date.
- Do: accomplish a goal or activity, such as buying, downloading or signing up.
- Website: reach a specific website or page.
- Visit-in-person: find a business or place to go to, such as "pharmacy near me".
Neither model is "correct". Use whichever helps you think. The rater model is useful because it separates Visit-in-person, which is the core of local SEO, and Know Simple, which is what AI Overviews and direct answers tend to cover.
Let the results page tell you
You do not have to guess. Search the query and look at what ranks.
- Mostly articles and guides? Informational.
- Comparisons and reviews? Commercial investigation.
- Product or category pages from shops? Transactional.
- A map with businesses? Visit-in-person, so local SEO matters.
- One site dominating? Navigational.
Search the query, then match the type of page, its format (list, guide, tool, video) and the angle (for beginners, for 2026, cheapest). This simple habit prevents one of the most common SEO mistakes: building the wrong kind of page.
Mixed and changing intent
Many queries have more than one meaning. "Jaguar" could be the car or the animal. Google often shows a mix of results for such queries. The rater guidelines also note that the dominant interpretation can change over time. Their example is "iphone", which first meant the original model and now means the latest one.
One page, one main intent
A page should usually serve one main intent well. An article explaining how to choose a heat pump and a product page selling one are different pages. They should link to each other, but trying to merge them weakens both.
This idea returns in the keyword research module, when you map keywords to pages.
Practice
Read the lesson, pass the quiz and do the exercise to complete it.
Knowledge check
5 questions. Get at least 4 right to pass.
Exercise: Classify ten real queries
Write ten queries your customers might use, from the exercise in the first lesson or new ones. For each, search it in a private window, note the main types of result on page one, then classify the intent with both models (Broder and the rater guidelines). Finally, name the page on your site that should answer it, or write "missing".
Deliverable: A table with query, result types seen, Broder intent, rater-guideline intent, and the matching page on your site.
Sources
Checked against these sources on 5 November 2026. Next review by 5 May 2027.
- How results are automatically generated and ranked (Google Search (How Search Works), official)
- Search Quality Rater Guidelines (General Guidelines, September 11, 2025), section 12.7 Understanding User Intent (Google, official)
- Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content (on search raters) (Google Search Central, official)
- A taxonomy of web search (Broder, SIGIR Forum 36(2), 2002) (ACM)